| 1NT (oneNT.com)® | Home |
|
..
|
Fred E. Ferguson Hilton Head Island, SC |
Introduction to New Minor Forcing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
After an opening bid of one in a suit and a response of one in a suit, a rebid of 1Nt shows a balanced hand with 12 to 14 hcp (1Nt Rebid).1 New Minor Forcing (NMF) is a conventional bid used specifically after an opening bid of one of a minor (1m); a response of one of a major (1M) and a 1Nt Rebid as in the following four bidding sequences: 1♣-1♥–1Nt; 1♣‑1♠–1Nt; 1♦-1♥–1Nt; and 1♦-1♠–1Nt.2 NMF should also be used over a 2Nt Rebid sequence of 1m‑1M–2Nt.
The notrump rebids are special in that by the time opener defines a notrump hand both opener and responder have already made natural suit bids. The system bids 3 used after opening notrump bids to find suit fits and define minimal, invitational and forcing hands are no longer available.
In standard bridge, after a 1Nt Rebid, there are no natural invitational bids available in suit contracts. With a weak hand (6-10 hcp) responder can make a 2-level bid 4 in search of a better part-score and with game forcing values (13+ hcp) responder can make a 3-level bid as game forcing. With 11-12 hcp responder must use judgment to downgrade her hand to a 2‑level bid (under-bid) or upgrade her hand to 3‑level bid (over-bid).
The bidding has been 1♣-1♥–1Nt: what would you rebid with each of these hands?
New Minor Forcing is used by responder after a 1Nt Rebid (following a minor and a major suit bid) to make certain invitational and forcing bids. The bid of the other minor (om) is artificial, Alertable!, and forcing for 1 round, showing that responder has an invitational hand (11 hcp) or better with 5 of her previously bid major and asks opener if he has 3-card support for the bid major.5
Most conventions are subject to different usage and interpretations; NMF is no exception. While the principles of NMF can be extended to other bidding sequences and can be used to show other types of hands, this Introduction to NMF is limited to the fundamental principles of NMF. In application, it is imperative to discuss and have a partnership agreement on the application of NMF.
A response to NMF will allow opener with one bid to show support, size and distribution. Most responses to NMF come in pairs; opener makes a minimal bid with a minimal hand of 12 to a bad 13 hcp and jumps with a maximal hand of a good 13 to 14 hcp.
After a 1Nt Rebid sequence of 1m‑1M–1NT, a NMF bid of 2om shows a game invitational hand or better and asks opener if he has 3-card support for the bid major.
As we have seen, NMF is used to show that after the bidding sequence 1m‑1M–1NT‑2om responder has an invitational hand (11 hcp) and asks opener to further describe his hand. However, with a really good hand (13+ hcp) responder should also use NMF as a temporizing bid for game or slam try without having to jump and preempt the partnership. All game forcing hands and slam invitational hands should use NMF as a forcing bid!
Responder uses NMF with one of two kinds of hands. In both circumstances responder is asking opener to further define his hand. Responder has either: · invitational values (11-12 hcp) – and is inviting to game or · game forcing values (13+) – and is temporizing.
But what happens if responder does not use NMF? The fact that something does not happen at the bridge table can often give as much information as when something does.
By not using NMF, responder does not have game forcing values, however, responder may still have an invitational hand, but will need to invite opener by jumping to the 3-level.
After bidding a 1Nt Rebid sequence of 1m-1M–1NT, the following are invitational.
After a NMF bidding sequence and opener’s 3rd bid to describe his hand, responder should know the size (min or max) of opener’s hand and should have a good understanding of opener’s distribution, suit fit, outside stoppers, etc. Responder knows much of opener’s hand, but opener does not know if responder has a game invitational 11 hcp or a slam try 17 hcp. Responder now has the options of passing; or calling off the bidding, if it does not add up to game; continuing the exploration for game; or making a forcing bid (any bid at the 3-level after a NMF is game forcing) for slam try.
Remember Bridge should be fun!
See Root & Pavlicek: Modern Bridge Conventions (ISBN 0-517-88429-1) pp. 61-66; Seagram: 25 Bridge Conventions You Should Know (ISBN 1-894154-07-X): pp. 165-172; and Blubaugh: New Minor Forcing (Indianapolis). Thanks to my friends and partners Marty Nathan and Peggy Gibson for their help and review of this document. New Minor Forcing (NMF) 4 of 4 – NMF
1 See 1 Notrump Rebid (NMF 3 of 4). 2 While the principles of NMF can be extended to other bidding sequences, this paper is limited to the fundamental principles of NMF. 3 See Systems On (NMF 2 of 4). 4 In standard bidding, a new suit rebid by responder is not forcing after opener has rebid 1NT. 5 Ibid #2.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fred E. Ferguson | fred@oneNT.com | 843.363.6416 | Hilton Head Island, SC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
..